Skip to main content
University of California Press

About the Book

The concept of intertextuality has proven of inestimable value in recent attempts to understand the nature of literature and its relation to other systems of cultural meaning. In The Memory of Tiresias, Mikhail Iamposlki presents the first sustained attempt to develop a theory of cinematic intertextuality.

Building on the insights of semiotics and contemporary film theory, Iampolski defines cinema as a chain of transparent, mimetic fragments intermixed with quotations he calls "textual anomalies." These challenge the normalization of meaning and seek to open reading out onto the unlimited field of cultural history, which is understood in texts as a semiotically active extract, already inscribed.

Quotations obstruct mimesis and are consequently transformed in the process of semiosis, an operation that Iampolski defines as reading in an aura of enigma. In a series of brilliant analyses of films by D.W. Griffith, Sergei Eisenstein, and Luis Buñuel, he presents different strategies of intertextual reading in their work. His book suggests the continuing centrality of semiotic analysis and is certain to interest film historians and theorists, as well as readers in cultural and literary studies.

About the Author

Mikhail Iampolski teaches in the departments of Slavic and Comparative Literature and Russian Studies at New York University.

Table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
INTRODUCTION 
PART I· BASIC CONCEPTS 
Chapter 1. Cinema and the Theory of Intertextuality 
PART II· NARRATIVE'S WAY: D. W. GRIFFITH 
Chapter 2. Repressing the Source: D. W. Griffith and Browning 
Chapter 3· Intertextuality and the Evolution of Cinematic Language:Griffith and the Poetic Tradition 
PART III· BEYOND NARRATIVE: AVANT-GARDE CINEMA 
Chapter 4· Cinematic Language as Quotation: Cendrars and Leger 
Chapter 5· Intertext against Intertext: Bunuel and Dali's Un Chien andalou 
PART IV· THEORISTS WHO PRACTICED 
Chapter 6. The Hero as an "Intertextual Body": Iurii Tynianov's Lieutenant Kizhe 
Chapter 7· The Invisible Text as a Universal Equivalent:Sergei Eisenstein 
CONCLUSION 
NOTES 
WORKS CITED 
INDEX 

Reviews

"Iampolski deals with concepts and ideas that are highly complex and frequently very abstract, yet his discussion—and the progression of his analyses—is always precise and easy to follow. . . . Each of his points is grounded in a careful examination of a specific text, and most of the texts are well-known to American audiences."—Vladimir Padunov, University of Pittsburgh